Image Courtesy: 123rf |
'Musharaka' which I
largely believe is the major significant argument for Islamic finance is a financial
activity where the bank or investor provides the fund for an enterprise but
also participate in the managing of the firm. Profits earned on the venture
will be shared between the parties based on the agreed ratio and the losses
will be shared based on their capital contribution.
For instance, If conventional
banks were required to share the profits and losses of their clients like the 'Musharaka',
whether on business investments or mortgages which led to sub-prime crisis in
2008 they would be much more careful. This is because their financial returns
would depend more on the performance of the projects that they finance. Interest-based
lending substantially divorces financial institution from their customers risks
and focuses only on the interest to be earned on the loan deal. In many cases,
the banker who brings in the loan deal has already collected his or her bonus
and sometimes retired by the time the deal goes bad and eventually causes
problem for the entrepreneur and the bank.
Budding
entrepreneur with great business idea without collateral often fail to attract
finance under the conventional system because of the interest based finance but
Islamic finance has bridged this gap through profits and loss sharing.
Despite the
prospect of Islamic finance, challenges abound as well. Some school of thought
argued that Islamic finance instruments are only an hybrid version of the
conventional instrument and that there is no significant difference. There is
also shortage of qualified professional who specializes in Islamic instruments
and also diversity in the laws and procedure in different countries where it's
been practice. I believe if these challenges are eliminated, non interest finance
can be the panacea for the financial crisis.
No comments:
Post a Comment